You can try Zsban Ambrus' TacitToExplict script [0] "It's not perfect, so
some strange verbs might not work."
However,
test=. [: +/ ([: -. 2 | ]) # ]
test tte
3 : 0
t0=. -. (2) | y
s0=. t0 # y
(+/)s0
)
test tte (1+i.42)
462
I hope it helps.
[0] Scripts/TacitToExplicit Zsban Ambrus
http://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Scripts/TacitToExplicit
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:00 PM, PR PackRat <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Group:
>
> On 8/28/17, Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The tacit translator was my faithful teacher a long time ago and I still
> > use it occasionally, nowadays to understand non-tacit code.
>
> Is there any translator (or is it impossible?) to go the opposite way,
> that is, tacit to explicit?
>
> At my basic J level, I write only explicit code, and I would often
> love to know what the various higher level tacit J examples that
> people write mean in explicit terms.
>
> Harvey (NOT the hurricane!)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
