Each j datatype is assigned a number of value 2^n and it is already almost
used up (only 32-bit range is used to stay compatible with J32). The latest
addition is literal4 in j805. IMO extended complex or extended complex
rational are unlikely to be a candidate to use the nearly used up resource.

On Sep 10, 2017 8:02 AM, "Louis de Forcrand" <ol...@bluewin.ch> wrote:

I don't know; I hardly ever use extended precision or rationals myself
either. I guess it would make the language more "complete".
Definitely not a priority.

Louis

> On 9 Sep 2017, at 11:34, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What would it be used for? (Related: how would the exponential aspects
> of complex number operations get handled?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
>> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Louis de Forcrand <ol...@bluewin.ch>
wrote:
>> There is no extended complex datatype in J (although its addition could
be a thought).
>>
>> Louis
>>
>>> On 9 Sep 2017, at 09:23, 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>   %2 NB. floating
>>> 0.5
>>>   x: %2 NB. extended
>>> 1r2
>>>   %1j1 NB. floating
>>> 0.5j_0.5
>>>   x: %1j1 NB. why not extended?
>>> |domain error
>>> | x:%1j1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Den 3:53 lørdag den 9. september 2017 skrev Don Kelly <d...@shaw.ca>:
>>>
>>>
>>> It appears that the verb   ^  may be a large part of the problem (as in
>>> 14^2). Check NuVoc  /vocabulary/Numeric Precision  and go the table for
>>> different verbs . This and the division may be floating point in this
case
>>>
>>> _____________________________
>>>
>>> ^ ^. -: % %. inexact (complex if needed),
>>>
>>> preserves extended and rational
>>> if result is exact
>>>
>>> _________________________
>>>
>>> Don Kelly
>>>
>>>> On 2017-09-08 1:36 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
>>>> No: integers do not automatically get converted to extended precision.
>>>>
>>>> Integers simply have sufficient precision for this example.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to