+/(!144x)<10000?@$!144x
72
   +/(!144x)<10000?@$!144x
84
   +/(!144x)<10000?@$!144x
83
   JVERSION
Engine: j805/j64/darwin
Beta-9: commercial/2016-07-05T17:11:06
Library: 8.05.14
Qt IDE: 1.5.3/5.6.2
Platform: Darwin 64
Installer: J805 install
InstallPath: /users/rauldmiller/applications/j64-805
Contact: www.jsoftware.com

I suppose I should try upgrading...

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 11:05 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see
>    *./ (!10x)>(500 ?@$ !10x)
> 1
>    *./ (!100x)>(500 ?@$ !100x)
> 0
>    *./ (!100x)>(? 500 $ !100x)
> 0
>
> Thanks.
>
> Сб, 23 сен 2017, Raul Miller написал(а):
>> It's an index error because the left argument is too large.
>>
>> The left argument would not be too large if ? had not generated a
>> value that was too large.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --
>> Raul
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:57 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > It seems A. not ? that raised the index error
>> >
>> >    (10^249x) A. i.144
>> > 25 136 10 70 86 12 82 48 114 66 1 128 134 9 22 143 96 36 14 30
>> > 76 59 141 44 72 129 45 41 75 123 39 27 24 49 6 31 106 68 50 4 57
>> > 131 80 16 34 18 3 13 51 90 108 84 37 99 32 55 23 83 69 60 11 110
>> > 121 115 33 117 65 111 71 78 116 85 7 61 104 46 130 19 139 102 47
>> > 63 73 79 118 127 88 8 35 17 40 54 53 56 132 87 5 64 58 107 120
>> > 97 126 113 89 2 140 119 98 15 93 26 81 95 109 122 52 29 38 28
>> > 138 21 94 92 42 20 142 105 91 135 43 125 0 100 74 101 112 124
>> > 137 67 103 133 62 77
>> >    (10^250x) A. i.144
>> > |index error
>> > |   (10^250)    A.i.144
>> >
>> > Perhaps it meant a nonce error.
>> >
>> > Сб, 23 сен 2017, Raul Miller написал(а):
>> >> I expected no index error, and the result from ? should be less than its
>> >> right argument.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Raul
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:35 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > What is your expected result?
>> >> >
>> >> > Сб, 23 сен 2017, Raul Miller написал(а):
>> >> >>    $(500 ?@$ !144x) A. i.144
>> >> >> |index error
>> >> >>
>> >> >> After inspection, I found:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>    10^.249{a
>> >> >> 249.746
>> >> >>    10^.!144x
>> >> >> 249.744
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It looks like ?@$ is sometimes generating values which are too large.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> FYI,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Raul
>> >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > regards,
>> >> > ====================================================
>> >> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
>> >> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
>> >> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
>> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> >
>> > --
>> > regards,
>> > ====================================================
>> > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
>> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
>> > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to