Well... that depends on what you mean by work. For example, - does not work in explicit J with agenda when what you really want is +.
Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Erling Hellenäs <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess it would be impossible to get you to acknowledge that it does not > work with explicit J in agenda :) /Erling > > On 2017-09-30 23:16, Raul Miller wrote: >> >> Yes, if you want to explicitly reference the definition of f, you >> should use the name f (like you used at first), and not $: >> >> $: refers to the containing sentence, which in your example was >> x $: <: y >> >> To have $: mean something different you need to use it in a different >> sentence (which is entirely possible, of course). >> >> Thanks, >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
