In case Arie doesn't get round to it, I note that your (Raul's) msg below is timed here, in my GMT time-zone, as "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:10:13 -0500" while Arie's comparison between verbs c0 and c1 is timed as "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:53:58 +0100" - NL presumably.
In case it's disappeared from your inbox, here they are: c0=:,@((1 0 1 */])^:(]`(1"_))) NB. c0 18 ... ~10x faster than c01=:,@((1 0 1 */])^:(]`(1:))) NB. c01 18 ... ! Cheers, Mike On 01/12/2017 13:10, Raul Miller wrote:
I can find a message where you used 1: in the expression, but I haven't found any message from you where you talk about 1: vs. 1"_ - is it possible I have not received it yet? Thanks,
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
