!! That's a GREAT idea! Having to box the damned indexes has been a
recurring trouble-spot for me, and when it matters for performance
workarounds are hard. I have never had a case where I was tempted to
have a multidimensional array of atomic indexes for amend, and of course
if one came up I could just enfile it.
I would change the proposal slightly:
In x m} y, each raveled item of m specifies a selector for y [this
selector can be an atom, a numeric list, or a list of boxes.] If the
selector contains more than 1 atom, an additional level of boxing is
added. The resulting
selector may not specify complementary indexing.
Anybody see anything wrong with that?
Henry Rich
On 12/14/2017 2:11 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
That said, if this had been done in the original implementation, then
a sentence like:
"If 2>#$y we ravel each item in the indices"
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
