Did you notice my comment about an anomaly using i. to find the first
<'N' ? If that is really a bug, then maybe it is producing some of the
peculiarity.

When AoC offers the ability to share a question, does it mean that the
identical data set would be shared, too? If so, that might be an easy
way to share my data. Otherwise, I could post it somewhere like dpaste.com .

Thanks for your help,

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> So, looking further at this, I ran your expression (for test=: ...)
> against my aoc dataset (then translated it to lower case and parsed it
> using ;: so that it's in the format that my routines expected).
>
> The original data gave me a path with 423 ne and 241 se.
>
> The result of your test expression gave me a path with 144 n and 664
> ne which meant, I thought, that you have at least one bad substitution
> somewhere.
>
> But then I ran the same procedure again against the same data set and
> got a completely different result (which also matched with my answer).
>
> So I don't know what's going on.
>
> Good luck,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to