Hi,

I also support the idea of this scalar extension.

#.inv or  #.^:_1 have a "kludgy" feeling ...


Jimmy

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can anyone provide a reason it would be undesirable to have a scalar left
> (x) argument to #: behave any differently than  x (#.^:_1) y  ?
>
> In NuVoc I find - "
> x #: y is used only when you need to state how many places you want in the
> result, or if x contains differing values. If you want just sufficient
> places to hold the value of y in the base x, use  #.inv to convert to a
> fixed base.
>
> #.inv is the same as  #.^:_1 .
> "
> A scalar extension of x is applied in expression  x #. y and scalar
> extension of the default 2 in the monodic forms of both #. and #:
>
> So why discriminate against other base values by not extending a scalar
> left argument?
>
> I think this would be a useful scalar extension and make sense when
> explaining #: and #. to students.
>
> Here are some simple examples around what I'm talking about.
>
>    #: 1234  NB. special case within special case??
> 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
>    #. 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
> 1234
>
> NB. Base 10 is pretty common for most of us.
>
>    10 #. 1 2 3 4
> 1234
>    10 #: 1234
> 4
>    10 (#.^:_1) 1234
> 1 2 3 4
>    10 10 10 #: 1234
> 2 3 4
>    10 10 10 (#.^:_1) 1234
> 2 3 4
>     (,10) (#.^:_1) 1234
> 4
>      10 (#.^:_1) 6?.20000
> 1 6 1 9 4
> 1 4 3 2 6
> 0 3 3 4 2
> 1 1 2 2 0
> 1 7 5 4 1
> 1 5 1 0 8
>
> NB. other bases can be fun too e.g.
>
>    29r3 (#.^:_1) 6?.20000
> 1 22r3 26r3  8r3  7r3
> 1 16r3    8    3    0
> 0    3    6 20r3    7
> 1  7r3    4    0 20r3
> 1 28r3 10r3 19r3 17r3
> 1 19r3 19r3 17r3 26r3
>
> I can't imagine any broken applications resulting from extending scalar x,
> but I'm all ears for hearing about one.
>
> Well, I guess if you really wanted the modulo of a number and used #:
> instead of | then you would need to make the left argument be a vector (or
> just replace #: by | ) but ... since -
>
>    (29r3 #: 6?.20000) -: 29r3 | 6?.20000
> 1
>
>  would anyone suffer from losing that identity?
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to