{`+: @.(<0 1)
{ +:
3 1 ({`+: @.(<0 1)) i. 6
6 2
The agenda produced a hook.
It looks like the code turns the gerunds back into characters (with
parentheses) and then calls the parser to parse the sequence of words.
I would consider this a curiosum and not bother to become skilled in its
use.
Henry Rich
On 7/11/2018 11:28 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
Upon re-reading the description of the "agenda" conjunction (@.), I noticed
that the form having a noun as the selector (right argument) allows us to
produced nested trains of verbs, e.g.
([:-)`([:%)`([:*:)`([:%:) @. (0;<1;<2 3)
produces
([: -) (([: %) (([: *:) ([: %:)))
Has anyone used this sort of construct (the resulting nested verb train)?
I have not succeeded in executing one of these. How could I give the above
train some sort of argument on which to work?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
