Very clear. Thank you. Are you relying on p.70 part b) of the old "J introduction and dictionary”? I’ve spent hours trying to get my head around this page. Wonderfully cryptic, enlightening and obscure — all at the same time.
> On 31 Jul 2018, at 6:56 am, 'robert therriault' via Programming > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good question Piet, > > I needed to think a bit about how adverbs can be written tacitly. Others are > considerably more advanced, but here goes: > > at=: 1 : '%:@:(u/) ' NB. Original adverb > + at i. 8 > 5.2915 > a1t=: %:@: NB. First part of adverb is also an adverb > +/ a1t i. 8 > 5.2915 > a2t=: / NB. Second part of adverb - obviously an adverb > + a2t a1t i. 8 > 5.2915 > a3t=: / (%:@:) NB. Two adverbs together form a new adverb - parenthesis are > required > + a3t i. 8 > 5.2915 NB. Tacit "a3t" has the same result as explicit "at" > > Cheers, bob > >> On Jul 30, 2018, at 1:32 PM, Piet Google <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> t=: 1 : '%:@:(u/) y' > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
