If I understand you correctly, your "adverb" (2j3) is a noun.
I'm thinking of an actual adverb.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Don Guinn <dongu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't need to mess with tie.
>
>
> v1=:+
>
> v2=:-
>
> v3=:%
>
> av=:2j3
>
> (v1,v2,v3)av
>
> 2j_3 _2j_3 0.153846j_0.230769
>
> (v1;v2;v3)av
>
> +----+-----+------------------+
>
> |2j_3|_2j_3|0.153846j_0.230769|
>
> +----+-----+------------------+
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:05 AM pietdion <pietd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your answer. But I can't understand it.
> > Here is what I want to do.
> > I have an adverb called av say.
> > Also have verbs say v1, v2, v3.
> > Then I want the verb
> >
> > v=. (v1 av) , (v2 av) , (v3 av)
> >
> > Of course I can write it out as in the last sentence above, but I was
> > hoping to be able just to define a gerund
> >
> > g=.v1`v2`v3
> >
> > and then "apply" av to g.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Generally speaking, its a good idea to include an illustrative use
> > > case with a specification, so let's make up one:
> > >
> > > Let's say my keyboard is getting worn out, and I have to hit the ` key
> > > an arbitrary number of times before it works. So I want to be able to
> > > form gerunds without using that key.
> > >
> > > So, let's write a tacit adverb which takes a verb train and flattens
> > > it into a gerund.
> > >
> > > The first step is easy:
> > >
> > > (a b c d)(`'')
> > > +-------------------+
> > > |+-+---------------+|
> > > ||2|+-+-----------+||
> > > || ||a|+-+-------+|||
> > > || || ||3|+-+-+-+||||
> > > || || || ||b|c|d|||||
> > > || || || |+-+-+-+||||
> > > || || |+-+-------+|||
> > > || |+-+-----------+||
> > > |+-+---------------+|
> > > +-------------------+
> > >
> > > And we can build up a tacit verb which performs the needed transform:
> > >
> > > isT=: 0:`((-:&(,'2')+-:&(,'3'))@((0;0)&{::))@.(1<:L.)
> > > t2g=: (}:,t2g@,@{:)@((0;1)&{::)^:isT
> > >
> > > t2g (a b c d)(`'')
> > > +-+-+-+-+
> > > |a|b|c|d|
> > > +-+-+-+-+
> > >
> > > But now we get to the tricky part.
> > >
> > > Conceptually, we want to do something like this:
> > >
> > > T2G=: (`'')((t2g`)(`:6))
> > >
> > > But that doesn't actually work. The problem is that we need to
> > > transform that initial gerund to a noun representation of a gerund
> > > before this can work:
> > >
> > > T2G=: (`'')G2g((t2g`)(`:6))
> > >
> > > In other words, we want an adverb G2g which behaves like the verb
> ('0';<)
> > >
> > > That's doable, and if you search the forum you can find posts by Jose
> > > Mario Quintana which do the needed work (you incorporate that gerund
> > > into a verb built with (&[) and then extract the relevant subtree).
> > > The modularity of his approach is a little different from what I've
> > > described here, but now that you know what you're looking for, that
> > > shouldn't stop you...
> > >
> > > I hope this helps,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Raul
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:03 AM Piet Google <pietd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe already answered elsewhere and/or an ignorant question.
> > > > But can’t figure it out.
> > > > Is there a (tacit) way to apply an adverb to each of a list of verbs?
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> forums.htm
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
