Ah, oops, yes.

The code "works" (executes without errors) the way it is, because that
numeric sequence never matches. But that's not the point of all that
runaround. I could have eliminated all that boxy stuff if I was happy
with the ascii box drawing characters.

Good catch.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:11 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Raul,
>
> Wouldn't you  need to use  ( 16 + i. 11 ) { a. or  ( a. {~ 16 + i. 11 )?
>
>     ( 16 + i. 11 ) 9 !: 7 @ ( [ ^: 1 ) '+++++++++|-'
> |domain error
> |   (16+i.11)    9!:7@([^:1)'+++++++++|-'
>
>     ( a. {~ 16 + i. 11 ) 9 !: 7 @ ( [ ^: 1 ) '+++++++++|-'
>
>    9!:6 ''
> ┌┬┐├┼┤└┴┘│─
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> > On Oct 29, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > ( 16 + i. 11 ) 9 !: 7 @ ( [ ^: boxy ) '+++++++++|-'
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to