i.&1@< is not useful. Probably you mean i.&1@:<
Henry Rich
On 5/5/2019 3:41 PM, Thomas Bulka wrote:
Am 05.05.2019 20:52 schrieb Roger Hui:
When applied dyadically, the verb finds the index of the first place
where
x is less than y
The verb is not very meaningful when applied monadically.
Hello Roger,
thank you very much for your quick reply. I think I got it now. But,
just a follow-up question, to consolidate my understanding: cl is
defined with @ and is thus subsequently applied to all members of y:
cl =: i.&1@<
3 cl i.7 --> 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
That means, cl is semantically equivalent to 3 (<:~) i.7 - or is there
any difference?
Thanks again and best regards,
Thomas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
