BINGO is right. That did it. I'll have to look at why. I tried using normalrand from stats but that did not change the results, like BINGO.
Thank you, so much, On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 6:30 PM 'Mike Day' via Programming < [email protected]> wrote: > BINGO! > > I'd misread that hidden_layer line. Try this rather inefficient > get-around which does achive what they intend: > > dhidden =. (hidden_layer >0) * dscores dot |:W2 > > and then, Hey Presto! > > cc =: train 10000 > > 0 1.09876 > > 1000 0.556147 > > 2000 0.2535 > > 3000 0.240415 > > 4000 0.238063 > > 5000 0.237042 > > 6000 0.236117 > > 7000 0.235589 > > 8000 0.23537 > > 9000 0.235135 > > 10000 0.235025 > > $h_l =. 0>.(>1{cc) +"1 X dot >0{cc > > 300 100 > > $sc =. (>3{cc) +"1 h_l dot >2{cc > > 300 3 > > $predicted_class =. (i.>./)"1 sc > > 300 > > mean predicted_class = classes > > 0.996667 > > > I'm using rand1 =: 0.01 * rnorm, but that might not matter much... > > > And so to bed, > > > Mike > > > -- (B=) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
