Brian, did you intend to show us the explicit form(s)? Mike
Sent from my iPad > On 20 May 2019, at 20:20, Brian Schott <schott.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am working with dyadic tessellations using `tesl` below. There are 2 > versions that give different results: "tacit" and "explicit" . The > "explicit" version works well for me, but I cannot duplicate the results > with the "tacit" format. > > So, I am wondering if anyone can tease the "tacit" format into the desired > result? > > Notice that the shapes of both "filters" and "image" are prefixed with 3's > and as a result the shape of the result reflects the 3 separate > tessellations. But my "tacit" version has an extra 3-shaped dimension in > resulting shape. > > tesl =: ;._3 > link =: ; > cntrl =: 1 1,:2 2 > filters =: 10+i.3 2 2 2 > image =: 3 3 3$'abcdefghi','ABCDEFGHI',|.'abcdefghi' > $cntrl filters&(link"2) tesl"3 2 image NB. "tacit" > 3 2 2 3 2 2 > $filters(4 : 'cntrl x&(link"2) tesl y')"3 2 image NB. "explicit" > 3 2 2 2 2 > > > (Btw, I have been using a trick to economize on the vertical space needed > to screen-print the results in my experiments. An alternative to prefixing > the expressions with "$" as in the expressions below, I have found that the > prefix ",." can be quite effective.) > > Thanks, > > -- > (B=) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
