Thank you so much, Henry. Very important to me.
On Friday, August 23, 2019, 01:35:35 p.m. EDT, Henry Rich
<[email protected]> wrote:
(so did Martin, I should say). I'll get on it.
hhr
On 8/23/2019 1:32 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming wrote:
> The trick doesn't work when y is a string (of code) instead of a file. So
>any processing of a file that creates J code (that will be the actual loading)
>must write a new file only because if the code includes that trick, it only
>works for file loads. The file approach runs into problems with multi process
>code such as that in zmq and jd add ons.
> The change (to add x parameter) is specifically required so that the trick
> you describe works on string y, where the trick would return the x parameter
> to 0!:n
> On Thursday, August 22, 2019, 09:48:46 p.m. EDT, Henry Rich
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There is a request outstanding for a change to 0!:n, giving an optional
> left argument. The justification is to allow a verb to find the name of
> the script it was loaded in. I don't see why the current 4!:3 and 4!:4
> aren't adequate. Can someone explain why
>
> (4!:3'') {~ 4!:4 <'name_of_my_verb'
>
> doesn't suffice?
>
> The request is at
> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Interpreter/Requests#Add_optional_left_arg_to_0.21:n
>
> Henry Rich
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
