Full detail at https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/com
for this, Details Note 11.
Henry Rich
On 8/24/2019 12:19 PM, Arnab Chakraborty wrote:
Thanks a lot. It was kind of hard to guess that. But now it's clear.
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019, 20:41 bill lam, <[email protected]> wrote:
Just as what Henry said, u must be there for x y to have usual meaning. u
can do nothing. try
f =: adverb define
u
y
:
u
x
)
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019, 10:07 PM Arnab Chakraborty <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
I cannot understand the behavior of the following code that I have
written:
f =: adverb define
y
:
x
)
I expected this adverb to convert any verb to one that as a monad is same
as identity function, and as a dyad is just [
It produces syntax error when called like
(sin f) 1
or
2 (+ f) 3
But the following adverb works fine:
f =: adverb define
(u y)
:
x
)
I cannot understand this behavior.
Any idea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
