Having had a chance to look at math/calculus, I’m pretty sure it’ll meet all of 
my needs.

I’ll keep J807 for reference.

Thanks,

Mike 

> On Aug 27, 2019, at 08:56, Eric Iverson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 901 and calculus primitives (D. et. al.):
> 
> If you want D. , and it completely meets your requirements, then continue
> to use 807.
> 
> If you want D. type facilities, but were frustrated by its limitations,
> bugs, and opaqueness (C code), then use the new 901 facilities. The
> implementation is all in J and is amenable to study and improvements. It
> may take a bit of time for this to filter through to common practice in the
> J community, but 901 takes the hard step. This is a good thing!
> 
> The C for these primitives was a lot of complicated code. That code was a
> lot of baggage to drag forever forward to new releases for the benefit of a
> few users. Users who will, in fact, be much better served if they move to
> the new framework.
> 
> Compatibility is a good thing. But it can be carried to far. If you want J
> frozen circa 401, run 401.
> 
> All published code (regardless of language or platform) implicitly or
> explicity is tied to the fact that it runs unchanged on only certain
> versions. No code of any interest will run on all back and future versions.
> It is best when code has a statement like: runs on j807, won't run on
> earlier version, may or may not run on later versions. The pacman addons
> has some mechanism for this.
> 
> A major J release (8 to 9) is when we introduce non-compatible changes.
> J901 is a big step forward and positions for the rest of the 90x series. If
> you want to be a pioneer, move to j901 and if D. is important to you,
> become part of the community effort to see that the replacement rocks. If
> you want to stay a bit behind the curve, j807 is solid and will be there
> for a long time.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to