I don't think this will happen in J language, but it's fine to implement
and use it inside application scripts. However I suspect unicode4 already
serves this purpose in that every unicode codepoint maps to an atom.

On Sat, Sep 14, 2019, 10:08 PM 'robert therriault' via Programming <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I suppose my most radical idea would be to store all the characters as
> integers which would correspond to Unicode Codepoints and only be converted
> to the specific encoding (utf-8, utf-16, or utf-32) depending on type upon
> display.
>
> I am not advocating this, but just offer it up for consideration. It would
> be a fundamental change to the way J handles characters and only the
> implementation team could determine whether it is even close to worthwhile.
>
> Cheers, bob
>
> > On Sep 14, 2019, at 6:28 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> J types are atomic types
> >
> > exactly. and J language primitives operate on atomic types, doesn't care
> > about utf8/utf16 encodings at all.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 14, 2019, 8:07 PM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 1:50 AM 'robert therriault' via Programming
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> For reversals, the way that I might approach that is to box the utf-16
> >> code units into code points then reverse and unbox. It would involve
> >> overhead, but it would allow the first and second parts of the
> surrogates
> >> to stay in the correct relationship.
> >>
> >> What I think you are getting at, here, is that unicode consortium
> >> "types" are not atomic types. They are sequence types.
> >>
> >> J types are atomic types.
> >>
> >> Boxing lets us represent sequences as atoms.
> >>
> >> In other words, I somewhat agree with what you are saying, but also
> >> this is an issue that can't be hidden and instead should be
> >> documented.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Raul
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to