I think maybe that first one should have been
".>,{4#<'0126'
0 1 2 6 10 11 12 16 20 21 22 26 60 61 62 66 100 101 102 106 110 111
112 116 120 121 122 126 160 161 162 166 200 201 202 206 210 211 212
216 220 221 222 226 260 261 262 266 600 601 602 606 610 611 612 616
620 621 622 626 660 661 662 666 1000 1001 1002 1006 ...
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:54 AM Clifford Reiter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Using Cartesian with duplicate digits
>
> ,".@:~.&>{4#<'0126'
>
> 0 1 2 6 1 1 12 16 2 21 2 26 6 61 62 6 1 1 12 16 1 1 12 16 12 12 12 126 16
> 16 162 16 2 21 2 26 21 21 21 216 2 21 2 26 26 261 26 26 6 61 62 6 61 61 612
> 61 62 621 62 62 6 61 62 6 10 10 102 106 10 10 102 106 102 102 102 1026 106
> 106 1062 106 10 10 102 106 10 1...
>
>
> Without duplicates
>
> ~.,".@:~.&>{4#<'0126'
>
> 0 1 2 6 12 16 21 26 61 62 126 162 216 261 612 621 10 102 106 1026 1062 120
> 160 1206 1260 1602 1620 20 201 206 2016 2061 210 2106 2160 260 2601 2610 60
> 601 602 6012 6021 610 6102 6120 620 6201 6210
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
