Yes.
Henry Rich
On 12/11/2019 5:46 AM, 'Mike Day' via Programming wrote:
So is it still ok in J9 - and will it be ok - to continue using the
following paradigm?
if. T do. B
elseif. T1 do. B1
elseif. T2 do. B2
end.
Thanks,
Mike
On 11/12/2019 10:23, Henry Rich wrote:
else. after elseif. is new in 9.01, and you found a bug in it.
JfC is for J6.02.
Henry Rich
On 12/10/2019 8:23 PM, Ben Gorte wrote:
Hi,
Despite repeated warnings in JforC I stepped into the trap of using
elseif.
and else. in the same if.-statement. It took some effort to find that
error, because the behaviour is kind of weird:
iftest =: 3 : 0
if. y=1 do.
echo 'one'
elseif. y=2 do.
echo 'two'
elseif. y=3 do.
echo 'three'
else. NB. should be elseif. do.
echo 'other'
end.
)
iftest 1
one
other
iftest 2
two
other
iftest 3
three
iftest 4
other
Wouldn't it be possible to have that working like expected? Or
elseif do
flag an error?
Greetings,
Ben
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
