Ok... well... the linear representation provided by 5!:6 has too many parenthesis.
Good enough? Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:29 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > There were cases where the code for linear representation left out > needed parentheses. The code is complex. I decided I would rather hear > complaints about too many parentheses than too few. > > Henry Rich > > On 5/22/2020 10:38 PM, bill lam wrote: > > This looks like a regression in j901. > > NB. j602 > > a=. +^:(0>.1+]) > > 5!:5<'a' > > +^:(0 >. 1 + ]) > > 5!:6<'a' > > +^:(0 >. (1 + ])) > > > > NB. j901 > > a=. +^:(0>.1+]) > > 5!:5<'a' > > +^:(0 (>.) 1 + ]) > > 5!:6<'a' > > +^:(0 (>.) (1 + ])) > > > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:01 AM David Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +^:(0>.1+]) > >> +^:(0 (>.) 1 + ]) > >> > >> There's probably a reason for parenthesized maximum? > >> Inspired by fixing ys at > >> http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Yellowstone_sequence#tacit > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
