It shouldn't break code considering that original spec is for an unboxed y, and it would not make sense to trap the error of sending method a boxed name. Haven't tested your code.
On Thursday, July 16, 2020, 12:44:13 a.m. EDT, David Lambert <[email protected]> wrote: I need an object to create an instance of same class. Solution, unbox and re-box value conew 0 {:: coname'' Is this a common need? Does putting boxopen into conew break code? If not, we could use value conew coname'' conew=: 3 : 0 c=. boxopen y NB. was c=. <y obj=. cocreate'' coinsert__obj c COCREATOR__obj=: coname'' obj : w=. conew y create__w x w ) Thanks, Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
