Yes, that represents the expectation and the implementation. But I am
not seeing how there's any inverse here, for the dyadic case.

   - b. _1
-

Personally I would expect either

- : +

or

- : (-~)

or some writeup explaining the thinking that makes the current
implementation the right approach.

Thanks,

--
Raul


On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 5:49 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     (-&5 inv) 8
> 13
>     (8&- inv) 5
> 3
>
> You are thinking it does the first, but it does the second.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 10/18/2020 3:27 PM, David Lambert wrote:
> > JVERSION
> > Engine: j902/j64avx2/linux
> > Beta-h: commercial/2020-10-03T19:37:53
> > Library: 9.02.05
> > Platform: Linux 64
> > Installer: J902 install
> > InstallPath: /home/lambertdw/downloads/installs/j902
> > Contact: www.jsoftware.com
> >
> >
> >    NB. huh?  13 looks right to me.
> >    8 -inv 5
> > 3
> >
> >    NB. expected
> >    8 *inv 5
> > 0.625
> >
> >    8 +inv 5
> > _3
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to