Thanks. I have been meaning to look at that.

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 23:33, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jupyter notebooks may help you with organizing your research -
> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Guides/Jupyter
>
> This has been my preferred tool - far above Excel.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:39 PM Justin Paston-Cooper <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I am open to suggestions. Right now I'm researching a lot of related
> > things concurrently. I'm storing some of the results in TSV files.
> > Some of the scripts are Python, some are curl | jq | awk. Some of the
> > results I am storing as variables in J scripts. I am constantly going
> > back and forth between differing representations, differing
> > environments, recalculating things needlessly, and so on.
> >
> > I am looking for a way to better organise my research. If not
> > spreadsheets, do you have some advice on how to coordinate all this
> > separate data in one place? A Make file could be a start, but this
> > doesn't satisfy the requirement of having a nice editable GUI to
> > arrange and display all the separate sources of data. Maybe wd would
> > be a start in that direction. I haven't researched the alternatives.
> >
> > How do you organise your research?
> >
> > Application: Researching interactions between prices of a set of
> > things in each of a set of places. There are many different analyses
> > that can be made. I am finding it hard to keep track of all the angles
> > I have looked at. These angles all reside in separate directories,
> > which is not ideal. I have hand-written notes, but those need to be
> > updated by hand.
> >
> > By the way, I wasn't envisioning doing any calculation in the
> > spreadsheet. The idea of the spreadsheet was simply to coordinate
> > communication and (re)calculation between various calculation
> > processes, display the results, and allow the display of the results
> > to be edited.
> >
> > Imagine an actor system with the spreadsheet being the coordinator.
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 20:23, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It would be remiss of me not to mention that you really ought to
> > > re-consider making a spreadsheet an integral part of your design, not the
> > > least due to the historically high rates of error that have been measured
> > > in spreadsheets - 1 to 5%:
> > > https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1602/1602.02601.pdf .   It seems
> > > incongruous to worry about the sixth decimal place in numbers with many
> > > digits before the decimal point but ignoring error rates that dwarf this
> > > imprecision.
> > >
> > > By way of comparison, in most code-bases where people measure errors, an
> > > error rate of 10 bad lines per 1000 lines of code would be considered
> > > unacceptably high.
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to