On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 15:59, Hauke Rehr <hauke.r...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
>
> My two comments (or, my 2¢):
>
>
> concerning the aleph numbers
>
> is this related to my concern about dependence on order?
> I understand the fractional digits to be meant to encode
> both (semantic) structure and order
> (or else the prayer wouldn’t be the best kind of example).

Yes I think so.

>
> After all, that’s why they’re doing ‘more’ than their
> relational counterparts where all columns are considered
> independent of each other and applicable to all of the data.
>
>
> concerning people’s workflows
>
> now that’s why I had been talking about the LEO editor
> because the discussion had been originated by a question
> about structuring one’s research; and I wanted to offer
> concrete suggestions as to how to actually get to using
> a system like this without the need of setting up a kind
> of database first.

I didn't have time to look into it the first time, but Leo looks
really interesting for the document management part. It got me
thinking about Xanadu: https://xanadu.com/xUniverse-D6. Thank you.

>
> The ordinal fractions could then be implicit in the tree
> structure of the nodes (you only have to have a convention
> for which node will be considered the 0 (aka ANY) node;
> and maybe another one on if/how an empty node is to be
> represented).
>
> The query script could then ask for digits and after each
> one give the list of subordinate valid digits and their
> meanings (semantics will be documented at each level);
> this will get a bit more complicated with queries with
> early 0s but then again, they should make sense mostly
> when the semantic structure at subordinate levels agrees
> which could result in a merge of the respective display
> of subordinate digits’ meanings.
>
> but this would require the fractions to be used
> the way I first understood it: the data is to be stored
> in “leaf” nodes only. I guess this would be the easiest
> and most easily manageable – also in terms of maintenance –
> approach.
>
>
> Hauke
>
>
>
> Am 09.01.21 um 07:50 schrieb Justin Paston-Cooper:
> > On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 00:13, 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming <
> > programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> >>  Answering Justin's questions.
> >> 01 question
> >> 02 answer
> >> 11. The data in your solution seems to be similar to the data in
> >> relational databases, but the query space seems to be the same.
> >> Cyclic relations seem to be ruled out, but this maybe isn't a problem. Am
> >> I wrong, and is either stronger than the other?
> >>
> >> 12. The relations between two ordinal fractions are: equality (a=b),
> >> subordination (a<b), superordination (a>b), compatibility (a<>b) and
> >> incompatility (a><b). You are right, no cyclic relation. The browser omits
> >> the records incompatible with the query ordinal fraction from the answer.
> >> (in another browser I painted an answer (a) to a query (b) white if a=b,
> >> green if a<b, red if a>b, yellow if a<>b, and invisible if a><b.)
> >> 21. Is it possible to provide a well-performing ordinal fraction
> >> interface to multiple separate files (hopefully memory mapped) in
> >> an intuitive way in J? For instance, if we are looking at a subset of
> >> columns which does not intersect with the set of columns of a given table,
> >> then we would like to skip reading the rows in that table seamlessly.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 22. Two files are merged into one by prefixing the line numbers of the
> >> first file by "1" and the line numbers of the second file by "2". The
> >> resulting merged file is then another ordinal fraction file to replace the
> >> original two files. Well-performing means fast. If the data base is big it
> >> is conveniently stored as an indexed sorted file and the browser is made to
> >> skip lines before a possible match.
> >
> >
> > See aleph numbers comment below.
> >
> >
> >> 31. I am not fully convinced that this is easier to manage than a
> >> relational database.
> >>
> >> 32. How to fit the credo text into a relational data base? I don't think
> >> it is at all feasible.
> >
> >
> > You are right. I spoke too early.
> >
> >
> >> 41. If we did need to define explicit tables (sets of columns), then
> >> this could happen in a separate schema table. What are your thoughts?
> >>
> >> 42. No, there is no need for a separate schema table. A table (like this
> >> one) with rows 10 20 30 40 50 60 and columns 01 02 has elements 11 12 13 14
> >> 15 16 21 22 23 24 25 26. There is but one file containing everything.
> >
> >
> > Yes this makes sense. I was worrying more about associating tables names
> > and column names to digits, but this doesn’t seem to be such an issue.
> >
> >
> >> 51. This doesn't fully solve the issue of coordinating the updating of all
> >> resources and the dependencies between them for updating. I guess Make
> >> would help.
> >
> >
> >> 52. What is the problem?
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out what people’s workflows are. Anyway, maybe not
> > the best topic for the programming forum.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> 61. I wonder how Jd could contribute.
> >> 62. So do I!
> >> Thank you very much!
> >> I will comment on Hauke's contribution tomorrow. Now only this: I am very
> >> impressed. Hauke's is the most qualified response I have ever received.
> >> Note that a line number in the data base may be extended by zeroes. " AMEN"
> >> = "0000000 AMEN". So "AMEN" is unavoidable in the answer to any query.
> >> Thank you everyone!
> >> Bo.
> >
> >
> > I think AMEN and ET should be assigned to Aleph 1 the appropriate
> > positions. BASIC should also incorporate this. This allows seamless updates
> > of sub-tables. If one aleph bigger than next after update of sub-table,
> > simply increment next.
> >
> >
> >>     Den fredag den 8. januar 2021 10.36.26 CET skrev Justin Paston-Cooper <
> >> paston.coo...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>  Quite an interesting paper. What were the reasons for its rejection?
> >>
> >> The mathematics is quite simple and well defined, however it doesn't
> >> go too much into the application aspect.
> >>
> >> I don't have the time to actually explore this in depth right now, but:
> >>
> >> 1. The data in your solution seems to be similar to the data in
> >> relational databases, but the query space seems to be the same. Cyclic
> >> relations seem to be ruled out, but this maybe isn't a problem. Am I
> >> wrong, and is either stronger than the other?
> >>
> >> 2. Is it possible to provide a well-performing ordinal fraction
> >> interface to multiple separate files (hopefully memory mapped) in an
> >> intuitive way in J? For instance, if we are looking at a subset of
> >> columns which does not intersect with the set of columns of a given
> >> table, then we would like to skip reading the rows in that table
> >> seamlessly.
> >>
> >> 3. I am not fully convinced that this is easier to manage than a
> >> relational database.
> >>
> >> 4. If we did need to define explicit tables (sets of columns), then
> >> this could happen in a separate schema table. What are your thoughts?
> >>
> >> 5. This doesn't fully solve the issue of coordinating the updating of
> >> all resources and the dependencies between them for updating. I guess
> >> Make would help.
> >>
> >> 6. I wonder how Jd could contribute.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 00:08, 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming
> >> <programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  "I am looking for a way to better organise my research. If not
> >>> spreadsheets, do you have some advice on how to coordinate all this
> >>> separate data in one place?"
> >>> I have used ordinal fractions for structuring data since 1980. ORDINAL
> >> FRACTIONS - the algebra of data
> >>>
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |  |  |
> >>>
> >>>  |
> >>>
> >>>  |
> >>> |
> >>> |  |
> >>> ORDINAL FRACTIONS - the algebra of data
> >>>
> >>> This paper was submitted to the 10th World Computer Congress, IFIP 1986
> >> conference, but rejected by the referee....
> >>>  |
> >>>
> >>>  |
> >>>
> >>>  |
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I wrote software for processing this kind of data in fortran, BASIC, and
> >> pascal, but not (yet) in J.
> >>> A BASIC program for browsing the data base is this.
> >>> 1 INPUT;C$: IF C$="" THEN END
> >>> 2 OPEN"CREDO" FOR INPUT AS 1: PRINT":";
> >>> 3 IF EOF(1) THEN CLOSE:PRINT:GOTO 1
> >>> 4 LINE INPUT#1,A$: B$=C$
> >>> 5 IF A$=""THEN A%=-1 ELSE A%=ASC(A$)-48:A$=MID$(A$,2)
> >>> 6 IF B$=""THEN B%=-1 ELSE B%=ASC(B$)-48:B$=MID$(B$,2)
> >>> 7 IF A%<0 THEN PRINT" ";A$;:GOTO 3
> >>> 8 IF A%=0 OR B%=0 OR A%=B% THEN 5 ELSE 3
> >>>
> >>> The test data base for illustrating the possibilities is this.
> >>> 1 CREDO
> >>> 11 IN
> >>> 111 UNUM
> >>> 11 DEUM
> >>> 112 PATREM
> >>> 1121 OMNIPOTENTEM
> >>> 113 FACTOREM
> >>> 1131 CÆLI
> >>> 1139 ET
> >>> 1132 TERRÆ
> >>> 11331 VISIBILIUM
> >>> 1133 OMNIUM
> >>> 11339 ET
> >>> 11332 INVISIBILIUM
> >>> 19 ET
> >>> 12 IN
> >>> 1211 UNUM
> >>> 1211 DOMINUM
> >>> 12 JESUM
> >>> 1211 CHRISTUM
> >>> 1212 FILIUM
> >>> 1212 DEI
> >>> 12121 UNIGENITUM
> >>> 1219 ET
> >>> 1213 EX
> >>> 1213 PATRE
> >>> 1213 NATUM
> >>> 12131 ANTE
> >>> 121311 OMNIA
> >>> 12131 SÆCULA
> >>> 1221 DEUM
> >>> 12211 DE
> >>> 12211 DEO
> >>> 1222 LUMEN
> >>> 12221 DE
> >>> 12221 LUMINE
> >>> 1223 DEUM
> >>> 12231 VERUM
> >>> 12232 DE
> >>> 12232 DEO
> >>> 122321 VERO
> >>> 1231 GENITUM
> >>> 12311 NON
> >>> 12311 FACTUM
> >>> 1232 CONSUBSTANTIALEM
> >>> 1232 PATRI
> >>> 12321 PER
> >>> 12321 QUEM
> >>> 12321 OMNIA
> >>> 12321 FACTA
> >>> 12321 SUNT
> >>> 124 QUI
> >>> 124101 PROPTER
> >>> 124101 NOS
> >>> 12410101 HOMINES
> >>> 124109 ET
> >>> 124102 PROPTER
> >>> 12410201 NOSTRAM
> >>> 124102 SALUTEM
> >>> 12411 DESCENDIT
> >>> 1241101 DE
> >>> 1241101 CÆLIS
> >>> 12419 ET
> >>> 12412 INCARNATUS EST
> >>> 1241201 DE
> >>> 1241201 SPIRITU 124120101 SANCTO
> >>> 1241202 EX
> >>> 1241202 MARIA
> >>> 124120201 VIRGINE
> >>> 12419 ET
> >>> 1241301 HOMO
> >>> 12413 FACTUS EST
> >>> 124211 CRUCIFIXUS
> >>> 1242101 ETIAM
> >>> 1242101 PRO
> >>> 1242101 NOBIS
> >>> 1242102 SUB
> >>> 1242102 PONTIO
> >>> 1242102 PILATO
> >>> 124212 PASSUS
> >>> 124219 ET
> >>> 124213 SEPULTUS
> >>> 12421 EST
> >>> 12429 ET
> >>> 12422 RESURREXIT
> >>> 124221 TERTIA
> >>> 124221 DIE
> >>> 124222 SECUMDUM
> >>> 124222 SCRIPTURAS
> >>> 12429 ET
> >>> 12423 ASCENDIT
> >>> 124231 IN
> >>> 124231 CÆLUM
> >>> 12424 SEDET
> >>> 124241 AD
> >>> 124241 DEXTERAM
> >>> 124241 PATRIS
> >>> 12429 ET
> >>> 124251 ITERUM
> >>> 12425 VENTURUS EST
> >>> 124252 CUM
> >>> 124252 GLORIA
> >>> 124253 JUDICARE
> >>> 1242531 VIVOS
> >>> 1242539 ET
> >>> 1242532 MORTUOS
> >>> 125 CUJUS
> >>> 125 REGNI
> >>> 125 NON ERIT
> >>> 125 FINIS
> >>> 19 ET
> >>> 13 IN
> >>> 13 SPIRITUM
> >>> 131 SANCTUM
> >>> 132 DOMINUM
> >>> 139 ET
> >>> 133 VIVIFICANTEM
> >>> 134 QUI
> >>> 134 EX
> >>> 1341 PATRE
> >>> 1342 FILIO
> >>> 1349 QUE
> >>> 134 PROCEDIT
> >>> 135 QUI
> >>> 135 CUM
> >>> 13501 PATRE
> >>> 13509 ET
> >>> 13502 FILIO
> >>> 13509 SIMUL
> >>> 1351 ADORATUR
> >>> 1359 ET
> >>> 1352 GLORIFICATUR
> >>> 136 QUI
> >>> 136 LOCUTUS EST
> >>> 1361 PER
> >>> 1361 PROPHETAS
> >>> 19 ET
> >>> 141 UNAM
> >>> 142 SANCTAM
> >>> 143 CATHOLICAM
> >>> 149 ET
> >>> 144 APOSTOLICAM
> >>> 14 ECCLESIAM
> >>> 2 CONFITEOR
> >>> 211 UNUM
> >>> 21 BAPTISMA
> >>> 212 IN
> >>> 212 REMISSIONEM
> >>> 2121 PECCATORUM
> >>> 9 ET
> >>> 3 EXPECTO
> >>> 31 RESURRECTIONEM
> >>> 311 MORTUORUM
> >>> 39 ET
> >>> 32 VITAM
> >>> 3211 VENTURI
> >>> 321 SÆCULI
> >>>  AMEN
> >>>
> >>> Some test runs of the program look like this.
> >>> 13510: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM PATRE ET FILIO SIMUL ADORATUR AMEN
> >>> 13520: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM PATRE ET FILIO SIMUL GLORIFICATUR AMEN
> >>> 13501: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM PATRE ADORATUR ET GLORIFICATUR AMEN
> >>> 13502: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM FILIO ADORATUR ET GLORIFICATUR AMEN
> >>> 13511: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM PATRE ADORATUR AMEN
> >>> 13512: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM FILIO ADORATUR AMEN
> >>> 13521: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM PATRE GLORIFICATUR AMEN
> >>> 13522: CREDO IN SPIRITUM QUI CUM FILIO GLORIFICATUR AMEN
> >>>
> >>> I realize that this is not easy to understand, but I know that it is
> >> worth while.
> >>> Good luck!
> >>> Bo.    Den torsdag den 7. januar 2021 21.35.12 CET skrev Justin
> >> Paston-Cooper <paston.coo...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>  Thanks. I have been meaning to look at that.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 23:33, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Jupyter notebooks may help you with organizing your research -
> >>>> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Guides/Jupyter
> >>>>
> >>>> This has been my preferred tool - far above Excel.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:39 PM Justin Paston-Cooper <
> >> paston.coo...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I am open to suggestions. Right now I'm researching a lot of related
> >>>>> things concurrently. I'm storing some of the results in TSV files.
> >>>>> Some of the scripts are Python, some are curl | jq | awk. Some of the
> >>>>> results I am storing as variables in J scripts. I am constantly going
> >>>>> back and forth between differing representations, differing
> >>>>> environments, recalculating things needlessly, and so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am looking for a way to better organise my research. If not
> >>>>> spreadsheets, do you have some advice on how to coordinate all this
> >>>>> separate data in one place? A Make file could be a start, but this
> >>>>> doesn't satisfy the requirement of having a nice editable GUI to
> >>>>> arrange and display all the separate sources of data. Maybe wd would
> >>>>> be a start in that direction. I haven't researched the alternatives.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do you organise your research?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Application: Researching interactions between prices of a set of
> >>>>> things in each of a set of places. There are many different analyses
> >>>>> that can be made. I am finding it hard to keep track of all the
> >> angles
> >>>>> I have looked at. These angles all reside in separate directories,
> >>>>> which is not ideal. I have hand-written notes, but those need to be
> >>>>> updated by hand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> By the way, I wasn't envisioning doing any calculation in the
> >>>>> spreadsheet. The idea of the spreadsheet was simply to coordinate
> >>>>> communication and (re)calculation between various calculation
> >>>>> processes, display the results, and allow the display of the results
> >>>>> to be edited.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Imagine an actor system with the spreadsheet being the coordinator.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 20:23, Devon McCormick <devon...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It would be remiss of me not to mention that you really ought to
> >>>>>> re-consider making a spreadsheet an integral part of your design,
> >> not the
> >>>>>> least due to the historically high rates of error that have been
> >> measured
> >>>>>> in spreadsheets - 1 to 5%:
> >>>>>> https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1602/1602.02601.pdf .  It seems
> >>>>>> incongruous to worry about the sixth decimal place in numbers with
> >> many
> >>>>>> digits before the decimal point but ignoring error rates that
> >> dwarf this
> >>>>>> imprecision.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> By way of comparison, in most code-bases where people measure
> >> errors, an
> >>>>>> error rate of 10 bad lines per 1000 lines of code would be
> >> considered
> >>>>>> unacceptably high.
> >>>>>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> For information about J forums see
> >> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------
> mail written using NEO
> neo-layout.org
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to