… sorry for the noise
As long as I don’t truly understand them,
I should stop writing before testing everything.
Just ignore both posts.

Am 06.02.21 um 04:37 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
> Sorry once again, I just noticed I ran this under 9.01 .
> So the examples may be correct.
> 
> Am 06.02.21 um 04:35 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
>> I think, the first two 'fold multiple' entries
>> (scan in k9 lingo) should have F:: instead of -~;
>> and at least the entry for k9’s do-n scan doesn’t work.
>> It’s the only one I tried since it obviously cannot
>> give that result. So maybe there are more mistakes.
>>
>> Am 06.02.21 um 04:17 schrieb Devon McCormick:
>>> NYCJUG's own Will Gajate presented some work on folds recently:
>>> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/User:Will_Gajate/FoldVariants .
>>> Please take a look and feel free to embellish.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will be happy for you guys to do whatever you think makes the
>>>> documentation best.  We are all beginners with Fold.
>>>>
>>>> hhr
>>>>
>>>> On 2/5/2021 1:19 PM, Hauke Rehr wrote:
>>>>> I strongly support this. Folds belong at the core
>>>>> of any functional language but I didn’t use them
>>>>> since I got used to doing things differently
>>>>> when they hadn’t been around; and when they were
>>>>> introduced, I, too, was disappointed by the lack
>>>>> of easily understood and adaptable examples.
>>>>> At least that’s the way things were then.
>>>>> But I was happy seeing them introduced.
>>>>>
>>>>> On one thing, I disagree, though.
>>>>> They may share that common umbrella page,
>>>>> but I think it should point to six subpages.
>>>>> The way I (don’t) understand them, they are
>>>>> conceptually too close for users to be taught
>>>>> about them seperately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 05.02.21 um 19:06 schrieb Raul Miller:
>>>>>> I've been thinking about
>>>>>> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/fcap and some of my
>>>>>> struggles with it, in its current form.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) The page covers six different conjunctions, and does not begin to
>>>>>> give examples until half way down the page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Conceptually, I would prefer a page dedicated to each in the
>>>>>> vocabular, with the diagrams from this page as reference material
>>>>>> elsewhere (perhaps an appendix, perhaps a lab, perhaps an introductory
>>>>>> document, perhaps repeated from each vocabulary page, perhaps
>>>>>> something else).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (2) Although the page includes a statement suggesting that it's better
>>>>>> to use the dyad form of a fold multiple verb than the monad form, the
>>>>>> page contains no worked examples using the dyad form (for example:
>>>>>> using numbers or characters).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (3) The u argument is an efficiency mechanism, which means sometimes
>>>>>> it's best to not use it and put the efficiency elsewhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (4) The result of the monad use of a fold multiple verb is 1 less than
>>>>>> the length of the original list, and that can be useful but it can
>>>>>> also take some getting used to. The result of the dyad use of a fold
>>>>>> multiple verb is the same length as the y argument.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     #]F:.,: i.12
>>>>>> 11
>>>>>>    #1 ]F:.,: i.12
>>>>>> 12
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, I think we need some good canonical examples of use for these
>>>>>> conjunctions, so that people can see how things work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (I'll see if I can come up with something... but for now I wanted to
>>>>>> leave this here, before I forget about these issues, again.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do any of you have a nice example or two?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
>>>> https://www.avg.com
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
----------------------
mail written using NEO
neo-layout.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to