bold claims again “in most cases it will be a single value, and not an array more complex than an array to fold.”
how do you know what “most cases” look like in all of J usage? what is a “single value” to you? I guess in most cases it won’t be an atom – we seldomly deal with atoms in J there is this word “vector” in its description as a “vector language”, it’s about dealing with aggregations of data as opposed to the atomic get-lost-in-loops world view And regarding your most recent post: • Henry isn’t a noone. He’s got a say here. And that’s for a reason. (or two) • the silent majority most likely doesn’t see a problem here so “only Henry” ist most likely Very Wrong™ Am 25.02.21 um 16:22 schrieb 'Sergey Kamenev' via Programming: > About consensus. > > Sergey Kamenev thinks that the order of the arguments of V should be > changed. > Hauke Rehr believes the definition of Fold can be improved. > Вrian Schott "I think I am in favor of Sergey's suggestion." > Raul Miller gave an example with 'control-like' and 'data-like' that > confused him. > > And only Henry Rich thinks that everything with Fold is OK. > > Sergey. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm -- ---------------------- mail written using NEO neo-layout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
