Fixed for the next beta.
When n has negative values, u^:n computes all the powers in an array and
then performs
($u) $ array
to get the result. The code was actually computing (($u) ($,) array).
So if u was not a list, and the items of the array were not atoms, the
result would have the wrong shape.
Henry Rich
On 5/21/2021 8:15 AM, ethiejiesa via Programming wrote:
9!:14''
j902-b/j64avx2/linux/release/GPL3/guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00/clang-9-0-1/SLEEF=1
+&1^:_1 i.3
_1 0 1
+&1^:_2 i.3
_2
$$ +&1^:_2 i.3
0
Similar results for other negative exponents smaller than _1.
My beta is a bit behind, but I see the same there, while my j901 is producing
the expected results. Specific version info below:
j903-h/j64avx2/linux/beta/GPL3/guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00/clang-9-0-1/SLEEF=1
j901-f/j64avx2/linux/release/GPL3/guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00
Can anyone reproduce?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
