I'm a bit late to the party but a little QA never hurts:
6!:2 'rrBS=. I.+./(|:3$,: i. 10) (+./ @:E.)"1/ sep n' NB. Bryan
Schott
2.50109
6!:2 'rrBJ=. I.,+./"2]1=($&~.)"1(0 1 2,1 2 3,2 3 4,:3 4 5){"2
1(6#10)#:n' NB. Bo Jacoby
1.32111
6!:2 'rrRM=. 1e5+I.+./(3#"1":i.10 1) +./@E."1/ ":1e5+i.9e5 1' NB. Raul
Miller
1.12046
6!:2 'rrJPJ=. ssd3 i.33219' NB.
Jan-Pieter Jacobs
0.0121709
$&.>rrBJ;rrRM;rrBS;rrJPJ NB. Shapes are the same...
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
|33219|33219|33219|33219|
+-----+-----+-----+-----+
But
rrBS-:rrRM
0
#rrBS-.rrRM
10819
#rrBS-.~rrRM
10819
And
rrBS-:rrBJ
1
However
rrRM-:rrJPJ
0
But
#rrRM-.rrJPJ NB. They have the same contents.
0
So, rrBJ-:rrBS and rrRM-:rrJPJ but -.rrBJ-:rrJPJ.
This fixes things:
6!:2 'rrBS=. *1e5+*I.+./(|:3$,: i. 10) (+./ @:E.)"1/ argBS' NB.
Bryan Schott
2.38279
6!:2 'rrBJ=. *1e5+*I.,+./"2]1=($&~.)"1(0 1 2,1 2 3,2 3 4,:3 4 5){"2
1(6#10)#:n' NB. Bo Jacoby
1.31562
rrBJ-:rrRM
1
rrBJ-:rrJPJ
0
#rrBJ-.rrJPJ
0
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 8:12 PM Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly, one of the coding style guidelines.
> Another one being KISS: keep it simple, stupid!
> I consider these two generally recommendable.
>
> I also read about someone saying in a job interview
> he doesn’t write code “larger than me head”.
> (It’s been written “me”, reflecting his pronunciation)
> Interviewer: “So you don’t write functions so
> complicated you don’t understand them.”
> Candidate: “No, literally: if it’s size is
> larger than me head, it’s too long.”
> Something like that. This is a way of KISS.
> But the way the interviewer understood it
> would have been a better way to do KISS imo.
>
> I also consider RERO and FEFO good practices,
> but as with most of the other ones out there,
> it’s personal taste which ones one wants to adhere to.
> (Release Early Release Often/Fail Early Fail Often)
> (FEFO: an Erlang coder’s mantra)
>
> … and then there’s dogfood:
> “Eating one’s own dogfood” means using the software
> one develops regularly oneself. Not always applicable,
> but it usually makes a huge difference both in quality
> and usability where employed.
>
>
> Am 07.07.21 um 17:48 schrieb Thomas Bulka:
> > Am Mi., 7. Juli 2021 um 17:45 Uhr schrieb 'Mike Day' via Programming
> > <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >> Sorry, Hauke, what’s the DRY principle?
> >> Mike
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I think it means "don't repeat yourself".
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
> --
> ----------------------
> mail written using NEO
> neo-layout.org
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
--
Devon McCormick, CFA
Quantitative Consultant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
