It's tempting to suggest that a bare return.
would serve. But maybe it should be a different, invented keyword (to distinguish 0!:0 contexts from 3 :0 contexts)? Thanks, -- Raul On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 11:28 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have wanted this often. If we could reach consensus on what the best > end-marker would be, I'll look into putting it in. > > Henry Rich > > On 8/31/2021 8:27 AM, 'Rudolf Sykora' via Programming wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > > > if I load a (longer) script, I sometimes want to ignore a part of it > > beyond a certain line. Is there a way to achieve that gracefully? (I > > sometimes just add something syntactically wrong to stop there, on an > > error). > > > > > > Thank you. > > Ruda > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
