> Something to watch out for: > both solutions need a fairly recent J version
That is correct; however, both <:`+:`*: dyad : 'x (`: 0) y'"(0) 5 7 9 4 14 81 and <:`+:`*: dyad : 'x (`: 6) y'"(0) 5 7 9 4 14 81 do not need recent versions of the interpreter. On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:53 AM Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Ben, > > I didn’t think about the simplest solution > for if a question like this gets asked I always > think it must be complicated to achieve and didn’t try > > Something to watch out for: > both solutions need a fairly recent J version > > (at least they don’t work with > > Engine: j807/j64nonavx/linux > Beta-e: commercial/2018-05-25T11:59:04 > Library: 8.07.26 > Platform: Linux 64 > Installer: J807 install > ) > > Am 31.08.21 um 11:47 schrieb Ben Gorte: > > Hi R.E., > > > > You mean this? > > > > (+`-`*`%`*:`%:`-:`>:)"0 [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > > > > 1 _2 1 0.25 25 2.44949 3.5 9 > > > > Ben > > > > On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 at 19:10, R.E. Boss <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Given a gerund of 8 (further irrelevant) verbs and a noun of 8 items, I > >> would like to have each verb work on one item. > >> How is this be done, given only the possible n=0,3 or 6 for `: n? > >> > >> > >> R.E. Boss > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > -- > ---------------------- > mail written using NEO > neo-layout.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
