On my android, I get what you would expect.
kk=.i.5
kk
0 1 2 3 4
] kk=.>:kk
1 2 3 4 5
i.5
0 1 2 3 4
JVERSION
Engine: j902/j64/android
Release-a: commercial/2020-12-10T11:16:47
Library: 9.02.08
J Android: 1.4.12/11/30
Platform: Android 64 (arm64-v8a)
Installer: unknown
InstallPath: /storage/emulated/0/Android/data/com.jsoftware.j.android/files
Contact: www.jsoftware.com
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021, 10:31 Michal Wallace <michal.wall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you using the beta version (j903)? please type JVERSION inside J and
> show us the output.
>
> If this is actually happening, then it's a bug.
> Could be something to do with this:
>
>
> https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/SpecialCombinations#Pre-Parsed_Parenthesized_Primitives_.28PPPP.29
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 9:59 AM Jon Quant <quanty....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have tried the following code and get unexpected results and wanted
> your
> > seasoned advice.
> >
> > kk=.i.5
> > kk
> > 0 1 2 3 4
> > kk=.>:kk
> > kk
> > 1 2 3 4 5
> > i.5
> > 1 2 3 4 5
> > kk=.>:kk
> > i.5
> > 2 3 4 5 6
> >
> > So this modifies the behaviour of the 'i.' verb! Is there a (functional
> > programming) grammar rule that says we must not modify a variable/noun
> > which is also in the expression?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jon
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
