Once these hypothetical Old Syntax pages exist, and are in good shape,
adding navigation from relevant old pages should be fine.

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 5:15 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You make good sense, but no one will read the Old Syntax pages unless
> told to.  The obsolete articles need to have a pointer to the Old Syntax
> page.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 9/21/2021 5:09 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> > We can learn a lot from history, though sometimes finding the relevant
> > bits can be discouraging.
> >
> > Here, probably what we need is a NuVoc treatment of
> > https://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dicte.htm
> >
> > Currently, it seems to me, we have stuff like
> > https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Guides/Parsing and
> > https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/GerundsAndAtomicRepresentation
> > and, of course, https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/semico but
> > we do not have anything analogous to the parsing and execution page of
> > the dictionary.
> >
> > Structurally, that part of the system probably has at least three
> > layers. There's the lexical layer (word formation) represented by ;:
> > but we sort of have another layer now used in the context of explicit
> > definitions, which handles the nested {{ }} stuff. And, on top of
> > that, there's the grammatical layer which deals with sentence
> > formation (described concisely in the dicte.htm page). And it's the
> > history of sentence formation which we are grappling with here.
> >
> > Once upon a time, we had something like a fork rule that went: edge
> > cavn cavn cavn and this handled conjunctions in a variety of ways that
> > are no longer supported (I think because of their lack of utility and
> > the esoteric pressure they created). And, for this issue, perhaps we
> > could use an "Obsolete Syntax" page which documents examples of each
> > of those cases, and viable alternatives which are still supported.
> >
> > Am I making sense here? Or am I talking crazy?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to