You're right. I was confused.
The rank limit will remain at 63.
Henry Rich
On 11/24/2021 10:18 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
It's true that the axes of a rank 80 *dense* array must mostly have 0
or 1 elements.
But this constraint does not hold for sparse arrays.
Consider this example:
example=: 42 (<p:i.60)} 1 $. (60#1e9);(i.60);0
Of course, there are limits:
0 $. example
|limit error
And, ... it would be good to have some representative use cases
involving such "fat sparse" arrays to guide some implementation
decisions.
If this would require non-trivial changes to the code base, it does
not need to be a priority issue. But that's a different issue.
Thanks,
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
