Wait til you get to 24. That one was the most difficult for me. It's not
really about programming, more like an old-fashioned logic puzzle.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 4:08 PM 'Michael Day' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:

> I don't think there are any spoilers here.
>
> Well,  I have at last managed to do part 2 of day 22,  one of those
> "days" when part 2 is considerably harder
> than part 1.  (I've found day 22 the hardest so far:  day 21 part2's
> Dirac Die was tricky,  because I'd forgotten every go
> had 3 throws,  but not really hard;  day 19 was quite hard,  needing
> working out how to reconcile "scanners";
> I spent ages on day 18's snailfish having gone down a cul-de-sac with a
> nested array approach!)
>
> It managed to run within a RAM of ~ 14GB usable at the expense of taking
> 70 seconds!  My data-structure
> wasn't ideal to say the least,  though the initial set of 420 "ops"
> generated only ~ 43000 small objects.
> The space actually used appears fo be ~9GB:
>
>      7!:2@] 'reboot2 data'
>
> 8721760
>
>
> There must be a better way,  but at least this slow-coach method didn't
> need a super-computer!
>
> I might inspect the efficiency,  but probably not - it's taken too long
> to find a working solution!
>
> Looking forward to Raul's posting next week!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike
>
> On 04/01/2022 13:49, 'Mike Day' via Programming wrote:
> > As I recall, a killer question until one realises there’s no need to
> preserve the order;  then it’s just a matter of maintaining counts, as you
> observe.
> >
> > I’m currently wondering how to acquire the tera- or peta-bytes of
> storage to deal with day 22 part 2.  Part 1 is easy, of course.  No
> spoilers,  though.  I haven’t given up yet!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >> On 4 Jan 2022, at 03:06, Raul Miller<rauldmil...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >> https://adventofcode.com/2021/day/14
> >>
> >> For day 14, we were supposed to run a "polymerization sequence" for N
> >> steps, and then find the difference in the quantity between the most
> >> common and least common elements of the sequence.
> >>
> >> For part A, we were supposed to run 10 steps. For part B, we were
> >> supposed to run 40 steps.
> >>
> >> The sample data looked like this:
> >>
> .............. [truncated]
>
> --
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to