I’d rather have the shape with respect to the topmost other kind.
First axis numeric:
the numeric shape below which the first symbolic one occurs
first axis symbolic:
vice versa
you may need to check the return value of the adjusted implementation
of the datatype primitive for those “other kind” atoms
Alternatively, have shape be the list of boxes of such shapes all the
way down.
The first idea would allow for non-rectangular
(@Elijah: afaik this is ⊥ to homogenous; homogenous: same data type)
structures as those symbolic substructures are considered “atoms”
no matter their respective shapes
otoh, maybe it’s better to actually keep things strictly rectangular
since that’s the way J and its primitives work (as of now)
I hope this is not written too confusingly.
Am 31.01.22 um 22:31 schrieb Elijah Stone:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Elijah Stone wrote:
I think it makes most sense to make symbolic axes positive, same as
normal axes.
Non-negative, of course!
A question is what the shape of a partly symbolic array should be.
(Or completely symbolic; I just meant not completely numeric.)
-E
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
----------------------
mail written using NEO
neo-layout.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
