> Most J programmers can’t tell nouns and adjectives apart. :D
> We don’t even have a type function returning grammar terms > indicating what part of speech our entities are. Poor us! There is the verb type defined in the standard library; unfortunately, it cannot handle unnamed entities (primitives), _5[\ type@:;:'ARGV type define on base a. = / @ ..' ┌────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┐ │noun │verb │adverb │conjunction │not defined │ ├────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┤ │invalid name│invalid name│invalid name│invalid name│invalid name│ └────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┘ > We should have been “more careful.” Right! ;) On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 2:22 AM Hauke Rehr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sure. > Most J programmers can’t tell nouns and adjectives apart. > We don’t even have a type function returning grammar terms > indicating what part of speech our entities are. Poor us! > We should have been “more careful.” > > Am 22.03.22 um 01:00 schrieb Raul Miller: > > Be careful here -- "implementation" and "automatic" are most likely > > synonyms unless we make very careful distinctions. > > -- > ---------------------- > mail written using NEO > neo-layout.org > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
