but with
(9!:19) 1e_11
I get
({.e.}.)"1 w
0 0 0 1 1
Am 17.05.22 um 16:40 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
oops, ignore that one – I see my mistake now
Am 17.05.22 um 16:37 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
I didn’t revisit pe80 (its been quite some time I last looked at pe) but
I get
<./ ({.>./@:|@:-}.)"1 w
0.539284
so you would need a tolerance greater than that
if you want to get at least one 1
with a sane value for tolerance, a 1 is not to be expected
so what do you want to achieve, what do you expect and why?
Am 17.05.22 um 16:22 schrieb 'Viktor Grigorov' via Programming:
Hey,
I'm working on project euler 80, and I'm getting stack errors.
Tracing the values, step by step, everything is in order, other than
the comparison. I have the following:
]w=:{{ ((1&|@%@{.),])y }}^:(>:i.5) @(1&|)@%: 23
0.256547 0.795832 0 0 0 0
0.897916 0.256547 0.795832 0 0 0
0.11369 0.897916 0.256547 0.795832 0 0
0.795832 0.11369 0.897916 0.256547 0.795832 0
0.256547 0.795832 0.11369 0.897916 0.256547 0.795832
({.e.}.)"1 w
0 0 0 0 0
9!:19 0.00001
9!:19 1.00000000000000008e_5
({.e.}.)"1 w
0 0 0 0 0
Lowering the comparison tolerance further doesn't help. What am I
doing wrong? This can't be a 904 issue, since it happens on the
9.03.08 as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
----------------------
mail written using NEO
neo-layout.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
