Is it possible to write a tacit definition of the monad "evokereverse" explicitely defined as follows :
evokereverse =: 3 : '(|. y) ~' name =: 123 evokereverse 'eman' 123 2022-07-02 16:45 UTC+02:00, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com>: > Pascal is right, after a small expansion: > > If your modifier does not use explicit x or y, then it can return either > verbs or modifiers. (the returned entities need not be tacit) > > Details at > https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/com#Defining_a_Modifier > > Henry Rich > > On 7/2/2022 10:35 AM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming wrote: >> modifiers ((A)dverbs and (C)onjunctions) can return any form of speech (N >> V A C) Though only have N or V arguments. >> >> >> in terms of tacit definitions for modifiers, >> >> thendouble =: +:@: NB. adverb >> >> For modifier there is one form of explicit definition that can be >> distinguished as semi-tacit: If your modifier does not use explicit x or >> y, then it can return tacit verbs or modifiers. If your modifier >> definition does use y [and x] then it is fully explicit returning an >> explicit verb of specific valence. >> >> >> thenA =: 1 : 'u@:' NB. adverb returning adverb >> thenAfter =: 2 : 'v@:u' >> >> >> >> J playground examples: >> >> https://jsoftware.github.io/j-playground/bin/html2/#code=thendouble%20%3D%3A%20%2B%3A%40%3A%20%20NB.%20adverb%0AthenA%20%3D%3A%201%20%3A%20'u%40%3A'%20%20NB.%20adverb%20returning%20adverb%0AthenAfter%20%3D%3A%202%20%3A%20'v%40%3Au'%0A%0AexplicitA%20%3D%3A%201%20%3A%200%0Au%20y%0A%3A%0Ax%20u%20y%0A%29%0A%0A2%20%2B%20thendouble%203%0A2%20%2B%20%2B%3AthenA%203%0A2%20%2B%20thenAfter%20%2B%3A%203%0A%0A2%20%2B%20explicitA%20thenAfter%20%2B%3A%203%0A%0A%2B%20explicitA%20thenAfter%20%2B%3A%0A%2B%20%20%2B%3A%20thenA%0A >> >> >> >> On Saturday, July 2, 2022, 06:15:29 a.m. EDT, Jacques Bailhache >> <jacques.bailha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> If I understood correctly : >> - A monad applies to a noun and produces a noun >> - A dyad applies to two nouns and produces a noun >> - An adverb applies to a verb or a noun and produces a verb >> - A conjunction applies to two verbs or nouns and produces a verb >> but does there exist something that produces an adverb or a conjunction ? >> In other terms, is it possible to write a tacit definition of an >> adverb or a conjunction without using an explicit definition like >> myadv =: 1 : '...' >> or >> myconj =: 2 : '...' ? >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
