On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 9:11 AM <tu...@posteo.de> wrote: > My preffered way of learning J to the point, where I will be able to do my own > experiments with it, "predict", what I would expect as a result and finally > find the bugs I did myself by reading online resources (again the dense ones > and not the "hello world" ones), would be to read sources like the NuVoc and > https://sergeyqz.github.io/jcheatsheet/
This matches my experience. And the J labs (jqt menu: Help > Studio > Labs...) are designed to somewhat cater to this approach, but other resources exist. > And I think, a "problem" (no native speaker, sorry) of these sources is, that > they are explaining J in and with J terms. I remember also being frustrated with this issue. That said, what's the alternative? Conceptually, we often get a better match with user interests when the J content is explained within an application domain that the learner is interested in. But that requires someone to have made the effort to build out some relevant content in the context of that domain. Some people have done such things -- for example: fractals visualization and j by Clifford Reiter -- but there are many areas of potential interest. > No harm meant! ... only my two mico cents... > You currency may vary... :) If you feel motivated to tackle one of these projects, I guess taking some notes along the way might help later on in refining the effort? Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
