If elegance is a concern, I'd go with: 'ab' (1 e. E.)S:0 'ac';'cab';'bca';'bab' 0 1 0 1
Thanks, -- Raul On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:21 PM Devon McCormick <devon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I doubt performance is very important for the sizes of arguments I > typically use but David's expression is more elegant. > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:29 AM David Lambert <b49p23t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (<'ab') (1 e. E.)&> 'ac';'cab';'bca';'bab' NB. quicker? > > 0 1 0 1 > > > > (<'ab') ([: +./ E.)&> 'ac';'cab';'bca';'bab' > > 0 1 0 1 > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > -- > > Devon McCormick, CFA > > Quantitative Consultant > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
