Near as I can see, none of this corresponds to + r2m {{m&+}} 3
--
Raul
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 12:11 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Cloak strikes again,
>
> isNoun_z_ =: (0 = 4!:0 ( :: 0:))@:<
> eval_z_ =: 1 : 'if. 2 ~: 3!:0 m do. m else. a: 1 : m end.' NB.1 : ' a: 1 : m'
> aar =: 1 : 'if. isNoun ''u'' do. q =. m eval else. q =. u end. 5!:1 < ''q'' '
> Cloak=: aar(0:`)(,^:)
> oa =: 1 :'u Cloak @:' NB. apply quoted adverb after result. Can produce
> modifier
>
>
> + 'X' oa 32
>
> 32&+
>
> 2 (+ 'X' oa) 32
>
> 34&+
>
> 2 + ('X' oa) 32
>
> 34&+
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, January 13, 2023 at 11:19:49 a.m. EST, 'Pascal Jasmin' via
> Programming <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> X =: 1 : 'm&+'
>
>
> What definition of r2m (result to m argument) below would allow X to see the
> result of + y (or x+y) as its m argument?
>
> + r2m X 3
>
> purpose would be for X to produce a modifier from application of "verb".
> Requirement is only that y argument (3 above) is outside any verb phrase.
>
> Jose/Dan's Cloak magic? turn result into atomic or linear representation?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
