[I thought I had sent this yesterday, but today I find it in draft status]
Note that you can eliminate some of the parenthesis here, and some of
the quotation marks (though this does place a burden on the reader's
understanding of j syntax):
({{y`:6 nc`''}} ^: 9 +:`'') (`:6) 7
23
or
({{y`:6 nc`''}} ^: 9 +:`'') `:6 ]7
23
The final parentheses are essential (to force early verb evaluation).
--
Raul
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 7:01 PM Jose Mario Quintana
<jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (3 : '((y`:6) nc)`''''' ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> 23
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:57 PM Jose Mario Quintana <
> jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Concisely,
> >
> > ncver=. 3 : '((y`:6) nc)`'''''
> > (ncver ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> > 23
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:46 PM Jose Mario Quintana <
> > jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> An alternative way is verbing, so to speak, the (nc) adverb taking and
> >> producing instead the gerunds corresponding to the verbs, powering the
> >> verbed adverb (ncver) and converting the resulting gerund back to the
> >> desired verb (extra parentheses and spaces for clarity),
> >>
> >> ncver=. 3 : 0
> >> u=. (y`:6)
> >> v=. u nc
> >> v (`'')
> >> )
> >>
> >> (ncver ^: 2 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> >> 16
> >> (ncver ^: 9 +: (`'')) (`:6) 7
> >> 23
> >>
> >> PS. The previous generation of interpreters allowed one (illegally, of
> >> course) to operate directly on the entities without having to go back
> >> and forth. For example, one can just write,
> >>
> >> +: ((Ver 'nc')^:9 adv) 7
> >> 23
> >>
> >> using the suitable utilities (Ver) for verbing and (adv) for adverbing.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 6:12 AM Martin Kreuzer <i...@airkreuzer.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear all -
> >>>
> >>> Having used Fixed Power (u^:n y) before, I noticed that it works on
> >>> the verb-adverb compound to its left.
> >>>
> >>> Let's have a simple, silly example:
> >>>
> >>> nc=. 1 : '[: >: u' NB. defining an adverb 'increase'
> >>>
> >>> +: i. nc 7 NB. which works fine
> >>> 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
> >>>
> >>> Using Fixed Power like
> >>>
> >>> +: nc ^:1 (7)
> >>> 15
> >>> +: nc ^:2 (7)
> >>> 31
> >>>
> >>> I do get the expected results (compound is executed once, twice).
> >>>
> >>> Here we have a verb, followed by two adverbs (if I understand correctly).
> >>>
> >>> What I have initially been looking for however, is how to apply the
> >>> *same* adverb repeatedly, like
> >>>
> >>> +: nc nc (7)
> >>> 16
> >>>
> >>> while having the adverb part "nc nc" somehow abbreviated.
> >>>
> >>> What would be a (or the) way to phrase that ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>> -M
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
