Thank you very much for your detailed explanation,
Raul.
y (~.,m)}~ (,m) *.//. >,x <@(<"1) m{y
If I understand the parsing rule for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clip 'f@' right out of the sentence, parse it while
consuming any .x dyadic arguments. then apply f to the
result.
Are there any exceptions to this rule? - or clearer
way to describe it?
-- if there would be any trains that would be parsed
after f is substituted back in, do they apply?
ie
h x [EMAIL PROTECTED] y = (h f) (x g y)?
__________________________________________________________
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm