Unless demonstrated otherwise, there is no such thing if the tacit expression is a verb, Name has been undefined or is a verb and fix (f.) is not used. All of which is true for those example.
erase nl '' 1 a=: a^:0: a a^:0: a=: a^:0: a a^:0: In the concrete examples of memos, the redefinitions did not use the previous cache. That's rate of performance benefit of non-self vs self would be the same on first and subsequent _definitions_. --- "Miller, Raul D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > > For some reason the subsequent definitions > > with name as opposed to $: just take > > more memory on the first call than previous definition. > > a definition of the form > Name=: tacit expression using Name > > Will create a new definition for Name which incorporates > the previous definition for Name. If Name had previously > been undefined, this of course does not happen. > > This is aside from any semantic differences between $: and Name. > > FYI, > > -- > Raul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
