Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > Here's the most radical, but also the most succinct > to the point that I can't believe it's actually working.
I think the idea of using class_name_'' to define the class named 'name' is a great idea. But I think that new should use the same convention: new_name_'' -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
