Again, whatever you say. I'm going to stick with the pacifying parentheses, thank you very much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- |\/| Randy A MacDonald | you can't pay for it, |/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | even if you want to. BSc(Math) UNBF'83 Sapere Aude | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. Natural Born APL'er | Demo website: http://142.166.105.166/ ----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }- ----- Original Message ----- From: "p j" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Radical default parenthesising method/idea > > both of these would parse to your statement. > +/ <:4+*/4-3 2 , 1,2*6-4 > +/ <:4+*/4-3 2 ,1,2*6-4 > but it looks like I need to revise rules :( as that doesn't match what I said. > note that 3 2 above is a single noun. > > ----- Original Message ---- > How about: > +/ (<:4+*/4-3 2),1,2*6-4 > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
