I dissagree in terms of what I'd find useful.
I'd not so much be looking for a one page tutorial.
(so focusing on making sure +/ is there is not so
important to me).
The gerund stuff, how all the trains expand, and
obscure assignment tricks included some I never saw
before, and is the type of thing that is much more
useful on a reference card, because it is not
necessarily content you know exactly which vocabulary
page would answer.
I do agree rank patterns and selection and amending
patterns should get a lot of coverage.
--- Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Random comments:
>
> I suggest omitting the references to gerunds in all
> but } and @.
> ("insert verbs from gerund m cyclically", etc.)
> Someone who knows how to use gerunds in the other
> places don't
> need them on the reference card; someone who doesn't
> isn't
> going to be helped much by having them on the
> reference card.
>
> The description for the monad #: is misleading.
> Likewise the
> description for a�.^:_1 y .
>
> There is insufficient coverage of rank ("). For
> example,
> the description of { gives various ways of using { ,
> but does not have one of the most common uses, which
> is
> 3 2 2 {"1 A to index columns of an array.
>
> Some operators may need more coverage. e.g. for /
> it says:
> u/ y Insert insert u between elements of y and
> evaluate
> m/ y InsertGerund insert verbs from gerund m
> cyclically
> I would omit the InsertGerund thing, and instead
> include
> at least +/ and +/"1 .
>
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
