Oh, now I get it. (<3) ((*:^:_1)@[)&0 ] 256 256 16 4
Bond has a special feature of powering! Now I am almost close to full understanding of your solution. What is the logic behind ~:/\^:_1 ? On 4/16/06, June Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/16/06, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > June, > > > > I find (@:[)(^:]) unappealing. I prefer the dyadic invocation of a > > bonded monad, ie. x m&v y or x u&n y , particularly when > > the primary argument will be the number of iterations, and some seed data > > is required for the intial iteration. > > > > See my earlier responses to this thread for an example. > > > > -Dan > > > > Thank you for the direction but I could hardly get it. > > I suppose the essence of what you are suggesting is: > > (100&(,~ *:^:_1)&256) <3 > 256 0 0 > 16 100 0 > 4 10 100 > > However, I couldn't get the hang of it. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
